ESG Data: Woke Capitalism or Better Due Diligence?

At Gitterman Wealth Management, we refer to ESG as the GPS of Investing®. Just as we historically used fold out maps when we would take a road trip, we now have GPS systems, which update constantly and include numerous additional data sets to make our trips smoother, easier, and quicker.  We now know more about road closures, traffic, and any of the other real-time issues and situations that might hinder our trip than ever before.

To us, ESG is the same thing.  Just as most financial professionals primarily used traditional financial metrics to evaluate companies, we now have access to a nearly unlimited amount of non-financial, but material, data sets to help with our investment decisions.  

ESG data sets are simply that—data sets.  This information does not tell us what to buy or sell.  It is simply additional information.  And while environmental, social, and governance, or ESG, may not be the best name for this data, political attacks on ESG as “woke” investing come from a misunderstanding of what it actually is.  We don’t know of anyone driving around today complaining that GPS is “woke” driving, do you?  

ESG data is not thematic or values-driven, and this needs to be made clear.  It is simply additional due diligence about the companies we are looking to invest in.  It has nothing to do with stock selection around sectors or themes, and it will not disappear, because no asset manager is going back on utilizing this data once they have started.  They might stop talking about it, or referring to it as ESG, but they are not going to stop using the data itself. 

What has to be made clear to the general public is that questions about values and not wanting to own things like tobacco, guns, or fossil fuels, etc. are irrelevant to ESG.  They are two different lines on the highway that do not meet.  Now, could we use ESG data to evaluate companies within a theme?  Absolutely, but ESG data does not tell us what themes to pick.   

The current and increasing political attacks on ESG are largely driven by the fossil fuel lobby as a well-orchestrated attack against the divestment from fossil fuels.  Yet ESG has nothing to do with this, and the best thing our industry can do is to keep bringing this point home.  If someone wants to attack divestment funds and say they are anti-trust, etc., then the focus of the conversation should be on divestment from fossil fuels as the elephant in the room and the argument.  ESG data, by nature, does not say anything about owning or not owning fossil fuels, and it doesn’t tell us what to divest from.  We can also get full ESG data sets on fossil fuel companies, and this data can be used to help us pick the most compelling companies to invest in.  

The fossil fuel industry is a part of nearly every product we use today.  Our clothes, headphones, iPhones, microphones, and the Blistex that we put on all have petroleum in it.  We can’t just stop producing petroleum tomorrow and have a livable world.  

Bipartisan discussions are what we need now to reduce emissions in a way that does not leave people behind and makes sense for everyone. Reducing ESG data sets to ideological arguments does little to make any of us better investors.  Our planet is more fragile than we once thought it to be.  Navigating a way forward with data, like a GPS system, may help us find a way home faster. 

Gitterman Wealth Management, LLC. All investment advisory services are offered solely through Gitterman Wealth Management, LLC an independent investment advisory firm registered with the SEC (CRD 153062). Associated persons of Gitterman Wealth Management, LLC are licensed with and offer securities through Vanderbilt Securities, LLC, member FINRA/SIPC, registered with MSRB (CRD 5953). Gitterman Wealth Management, LLC and Vanderbilt Securities, LLC are separate and distinct federally regulated entities. For more information see

This document does not constitute advice or a recommendation or offer to sell or a solicitation to deal in any security or financial product. It is provided for information purposes only and on the understanding that the recipient has sufficient knowledge and experience to be able to understand and make their own evaluation of the proposals and services described herein, any risks associated therewith and any related legal, tax, accounting or other material considerations. To the extent that the reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to their specific portfolio or situation, prospective investors are encouraged to contact Gitterman Asset Management or consult with the professional advisor of their choosing.

Certain information contained herein has been obtained from third party sources and such information has not been independently verified by Gitterman. No representation, warranty, or undertaking, expressed or implied, is given to the accuracy or completeness of such information by Gitterman or any other person. While such sources are believed to be reliable, Gitterman does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. Gitterman does not undertake any obligation to update the information contained herein as of any future date.

Certain information contained herein constitutes “forward-looking statements,” which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” or “believe,” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events, results or actual performance may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Nothing contained herein may be relied upon as a guarantee, promise, assurance or a representation as to the future.

The information set forth herein is intended to be informational in nature and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, investment advice. This information is accurate as of the above-listed date and it should not be assumed that it will remain the same over time.

Meet with an Advisor